Seventh Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 190
HOUSE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv02109
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE L. HOUSE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Zachary Winters v. Nancy Berryhill
as 17-2083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACHARY WINTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Graves v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv03648
Plaintiff:
Mary Ella Graves
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PAIGE-ARMSTRONG v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01573
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
SHARON K PAIGE-ARMSTRONG
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005 Review of Agency Action-HHS
Davenport v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv02107
Plaintiff:
Robert B Davenport
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Tittelbach v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2017cv04106
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John Tittelbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lazaro v. Price
as 1:2017cv02852
Plaintiff:
Michael A Lazaro
Defendant:
Thomas E. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
SMITH v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01039
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
RODNEY SMITH
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WINSTEAD v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00137
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
RONNIE WINSTEAD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005 Review of Agency Action-HHS
HUNT v BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00805
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
GERALD D. HUNT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005 Review of Agency Action-HHS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
