US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Henry's On Main LLC v. Village of Rochester et al
as 3:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
Henry's On Main, LLC and Henry's On Main LLC
Defendant:
Village of Rochester and Joseph Suerdieck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Libaia Nseya v. Kraft Heinz Food Company
as 2:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Isabelle Libata Nseya
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Food Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mays v. Schiller et al
as 3:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Teah Mays
Defendant:
Luke Schiller, Ryan Schiller and Melissa Schiller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Aceves v. Central Management Services
as 3:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Israel Aceves
Defendant:
Central Management Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
