US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 6,116
Zellers v. Fifth 3rd Bank
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Zellers, Jr
Defendant:
Fifth 3rd Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Glover et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ryan Glover
Defendant:
Marshall County Drug Task Force, Marshall County Sheriff's Department, Marshall County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bure v. Gann et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Bure
Defendant:
C Gann, Erin Williams, Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Jostes et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Ladarreon Austin
Defendant:
Jordan Jostes, B Wells and Liu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Mayes
as 3:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Billy Asher Wilson
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Redding
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brian Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy Redding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
