US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 118
Ellis v AT&T Midwest et al
as 3:2018cv00530
Defendant:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, DISTRICT 4, AT&T MIDWEST and Communications Workers of America District 4
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Badger v. Steuben County et al
as 1:2018cv00163
Plaintiff:
Christena Badger
Defendant:
Steuben County Indiana , Steuben County EMS and Mary Allred
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cofoid v Flame Resistant Garments Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00147
Plaintiff:
Gregory P Cofoid
Defendant:
Flame Resistant Garments Inc , Michael Miller and Robert Tepperman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Ragsdale v. Beacon Health Systems Inc
as 3:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Ragsdale
Defendant:
Beacon Health Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watnick v. Holsum of Fort Wayne, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
Darin J Watnick
Defendant:
Holsum of Fort Wayne, Inc. , Lewis Bakeries, Inc. and Lewis Brothers Bakeries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Morland et al v. MK2J Merrillville Auto LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Stella Morland and Gregory Morland
Defendant:
MK2J Merrillville Auto LLC , Home Run Auto Group LLC , JD Byrider Systems LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Luna v. Franciscan Alliance Inc
as 3:2017cv00919
Plaintiff:
April Luna
Defendant:
Franciscan Alliance Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
GEISER v. GOSHEN HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
as 3:2017cv00864
Plaintiff:
Lisa Geiser
Defendant:
Goshen Health System Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Smith v. TPUSA, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00425
Plaintiff:
Breanna Smith
Defendant:
TPUSA Inc and TPUSA-FHCS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hughes v Zimmer Biomet, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00605
Plaintiff:
Steve Hughes
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
