Indiana Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,717
HIGUITA (CHARIF) v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01251
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA C. HIGUITA (CHARIF)
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Rhone ex rel KRL a minor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00253
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Joan Rhone ex rel KRL a minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
EMERY v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
REBECCA ANN EMERY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kragenbrink v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00057
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Heather C. Kragenbrink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Daugherty v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv00306
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SINGLETON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01223
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
WENDY L SINGLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
NYBOER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01222
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
CELESTE NYBOER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cole v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cole
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Duda v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00588
Unknown:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Gregory Joseph Duda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
STEELE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01217
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. STEELE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
