Indiana Social Security Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 9,103
Bishop v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00271
Plaintiff: Debra Jean Bishop
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Woolwine v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff: Angela S. Woolwine
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HINES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff: SHARON L HINES
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Combs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff: CLINT COMBS
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Slusher v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff: Mary M. Slusher
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Chaja v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff: Autumn L. Chaja
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Baker v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff: Sara J. Baker
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McKee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff: Tyler McKee
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Hutchins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Sean Hutchins
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SCHAEFER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff: MICHELLE S. SCHAEFER
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?