Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 181 - 190 of 311
REYNOLDS et al v. SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL et al
as 1:2010cv01552
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ELSLER, KAY HOMIER and CHRISTOPHER REYNOLDS
Defendant:
JANE D. JONES, GWEN PETTEWAY, THOMAS RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Caster v. Huntington Cove et al
as 2:2010cv00456
Plaintiff:
David Caster
Defendant:
Huntington Cove and Edward Rose & Sons
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BROWDER v. INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2010cv01269
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE BROWDER
Defendant:
INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HARGRAVE v. B&B FOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
as 2:2010cv00269
Defendant:
B&B FOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DENNIS HARGRAVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RICE v. GIBSON COUNTY AREA REHABILITATION CENTERS, INC.
as 3:2010cv00146
Defendant:
GIBSON COUNTY AREA REHABILITATION CENTERS, INC.
Plaintiff:
HEATHER RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hosier v. Living Essentials LLC
as 3:2010cv00395
Plaintiff:
Cindy Hosier
Defendant:
Living Essentials LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fml
SHAFER v. PREMIER TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 3:2010cv00128
Defendant:
PREMIER TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY SHAFER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
SMITH v. PAYDAY LOAN STORE OF INDANA, INC.
as 1:2010cv00948
Defendant:
PAYDAY LOAN STORE OF INDIANA, INC.
Plaintiff:
RANDY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WATKINS v. ZOOM ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
as 1:2010cv00947
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. WATKINS
Defendant:
ZOOM ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BAKER et al v. FALCON HOLDINGS, LTD.
as 1:2010cv00949
Plaintiff:
DAVID BAKER, FRANCES COLLINS and NEINA FLANIGAN
Defendant:
FALCON HOLDINGS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
