Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 311
Richardson v. Emeritus Senior Living et al
as 2:2012cv00147
Plaintiff:
Sherri Richardson
Defendant:
Emeritus Senior Living, Tim Marzac and Laura Field
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
STARK v. LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2012cv00372
Defendant:
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ERIN STARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CAESAR v. G&H STAFFING CONSULTANTS et al
as 1:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
CHRIS CAESAR
Defendant:
G&H STAFFING CONSULTANTS and LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson v. Lake Minnehaha Owner's Association
as 2:2012cv00108
Plaintiff:
Esau Robinson
Defendant:
Lake Minnehaha Owner's Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Varvel v. ADS Logistics Company LLC
as 2:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Joseph O Varvel
Defendant:
ADS Logistics Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
SANKPILL v. STONE BELT ARC, INC.
as 1:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
NATHAN SANKPILL
Defendant:
STONE BELT ARC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
SHEPHERD v. ASI, LIMITED
as 1:2012cv00167
Defendant:
ASI, LIMITED
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
WATSON v. INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, INC.
as 3:2012cv00002
Defendant:
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHAD WATSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
BLANKENSHIP v. GREAT DANE TRAILERS INDIANA, INC.
as 2:2011cv00338
Plaintiff:
HEATHER BLANKENSHIP
Defendant:
GREAT DANE TRAILERS INDIANA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
PLATT v. LOCAL 1070, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION
as 1:2011cv01737
Defendant:
LOCAL 1070, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY C. PLATT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184 Violation Collection Bargain Agreement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
