U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 104
John Middleton v. Don Roper
as 14-2667
Petitioner - Appellee:
John C. Middleton
Respondent - Appellant:
Don Roper
Richard Strong, et al v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-2354
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Movant - Appellant:
Richard Strong and Marcellus S. Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
William Rousan v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-1919
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William L. Rousan
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
Jeffrey Ferguson v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-1693
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeffrey R. Ferguson
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
Paul Goodwin v. Donald Roper
as 14-1588
Petitioner - Appellant:
Paul T. Goodwin
Respondent - Appellee:
Donald P. Roper
Jeffrey Ferguson v. Troy Steele
as 14-1577
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jeffrey R. Ferguson
Respondent - Appellee:
Al Luebbers
Michael Taylor v. Michael Bowersox, et al
as 14-1403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Bowersox and Jeremiah Nixon
Ledell Lee v. Ray Hobb
as 14-1363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ledell Lee
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Michael Taylor v. Michael Bowersox
as 14-1239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael S. Bowersox
Herbert Smulls v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-1193
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Herbert Smulls
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
