U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,934
Kenja Carmichael v. Eric Williams
as 24-1823
Petitioner:
Kenja Omari Deangelo Carmichael
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Honora Patterson v. Doug Witte, et al
as 24-1818
Plaintiff:
Honora Tremaine Patterson
Defendant:
Doug Witte, Correctional Officer, Pat Barnum, Correctional Officer, Alexandra O'Brien, Nurse and others
Michael Parkins v. Deigarion Staten, et al
as 24-1814
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M. Staten, Corporal, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Scott Taylor, Major, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Watson, Lt., East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
Sheng-Wen Cheng v. Warden Jared Rardin
as 24-1796
Petitioner:
Sheng-Wen Cheng
Respondent:
Warden Jared Rardin
Jonathan Brown v. Nicholas Lamb
as 24-1798
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Brown
Defendant:
Nicholas Lamb, Warden
Carlos Johnson v. Doris Falkenrath
as 24-1792
Plaintiff:
Carlos Johnson
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Superintendent
Danny Hooper v. Roosevelt Barden
as 24-1783
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Hooper
Defendant:
Roosevelt Barden, Captain Shift Supervisor, EARU
Eric Sorenson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1785
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson, also known as Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Department of Human Services, (DHS) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law and others
Joanthony Johnson v. Michele Buckner
as 24-1779
Plaintiff:
Joanthony Johnson
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Warden, SCCC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
