Arkansas Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,345
Langley et al v. Frost-Burne, LLC
as 5:2023cv05031
Plaintiff:
Joshua Langley and Victoria Ray
Defendant:
Frost-Burne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Randolph v. TMone LLC
as 4:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Sharhonda Randolph
Defendant:
TMone LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Woodell v. HMSHost Corporation
as 4:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Woodell
Defendant:
HMSHost Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Mahoney v. Geraldi's of Berryville, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05023
Plaintiff:
Lauren Madison Mahoney
Defendant:
Geraldi's of Berryville, Inc. doing business as Geraldi's of Fayetteville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Williams v. D&H Contracting Inc
as 3:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Trevor Williams
Defendant:
D&H Contracting Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
McDonald et al v. Stetson Courier Inc et al
as 4:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Johnny Carroll McDonald, Casey Jackson, Philip Fitzgerald and others
Defendant:
Stetson Courier Inc and John Stetson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Burris v. Baxter Regional Health System
as 3:2023cv03008
Plaintiff:
Angel Burris
Defendant:
Baxter Regional Health System
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sostaita v. Sanchez Concrete LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Marcelo Sostaita
Defendant:
Sanchez Concrete LLC and Alejandro Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Vazquez v. Smiling Camel Inc
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Valerie Vazquez
Defendant:
Smiling Camel Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Barranco v. Den-Tex Central, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05010
Plaintiff:
Christina Barranco
Defendant:
Den-Tex Central, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
