US District Court for the District of Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,043
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2022cv01704
Petitioner: Darrell D. Smith
Respondent: B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perkins v. Raurdin
as 0:2022cv01691
Petitioner: Victor B. Perkins
Respondent: Jared Raurdin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rowland v. FMHP et al
as 0:2022cv01692
Petitioner: Jesse Rowland
Respondent: FMHP and MSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frees v. Starr
as 0:2022cv01688
Petitioner: Nastassia Frees
Respondent: Mistelle Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flynn v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2022cv01690
Petitioner: Scott Phillip Flynn
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brooks v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2022cv01625
Petitioner: Lennie Dwayne Brooks
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. Moore
as 0:2022cv01629
Plaintiff: Dale A. Williams, Sr.
Defendant: Nancy Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alkamel v. Eischen
as 0:2022cv01630
Petitioner: Malik Noaman Alkamel
Respondent: B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Waters v. United States of America
as 0:2022cv01631
Petitioner: Amber Denise Waters
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benson v. Harpstead
as 0:2022cv01601
Plaintiff: Michael Benson
Defendant: Jodi Harpstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?