US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,268
Tisdale v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Tisdale
Defendant:
City of St. Louis and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bracken v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Garvester Bracken
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Calea Stovall-Reid and Joan L. Moriarty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNealy v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Matthew McNealy
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah and Jaclyn Rattler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmer v. USA
as 1:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Marcrease Delance Farmer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dorsey v. USA
as 1:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Eric B. Dorsey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Loreen Armstrong, Unknown Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Vandergriff et al
as 4:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Robbie Robertson
Defendant:
Teri Vandergriff, Co. Unknown Aubuchon and Co. Unknown Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bynum v. City of Bridgton MO. et al
as 4:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Darryl R. Bynum
Defendant:
City of Bridgton MO. and St. Louis County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuget v. USA
as 4:2024cv00579
Petitioner:
Justin Fuget
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Leist v. Griffin et al
as 4:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Zachery Leist
Defendant:
Tyler Griffin, C. James and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
