Nebraska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 3,641
Inman v. USA
as 8:2023cv00251
Petitioner:
Tracy Inman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jankowski v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
Lauree Jankowski
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Travis Cox
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Omaha Police Department, Charles Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Jefferys
as 8:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Bobby S. Moss
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Schmaderer et al
as 8:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Jacara Thompson
Defendant:
Todd Schmaderer, Brian Diminco, Officer Tyler Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mena-Valdez v. USA
as 8:2023cv00246
Petitioner:
Jose Mena-Valdez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cox v. Douglas County Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Travis Cox
Defendant:
Douglas County Department of Corrections, Wellpath and Mike Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. Schwab
as 4:2023cv03101
Plaintiff:
Raul I. Calderon
Defendant:
Perdition Nate Schwab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley v. Myers
as 8:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Troy R. Finley
Respondent:
Micheal Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Foard v. Bahensky et al
as 8:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Dalonte D Foard and Dalonte D. Foard
Defendant:
Todd Bahensky, D. Winkler, Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
