Nebraska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,637
Robinson v. Cpl. Thompson
as 8:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Cpl. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Cordonier et al
as 8:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Kirk Robinson
Defendant:
Cordonier, Devries and Robert Madsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv03237
Petitioner:
Edd Tawon Payne
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walker v. Folts
as 4:2023cv03234
Plaintiff:
Valeisha Walker
Defendant:
Angela Folts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro-Santos v. USA
as 8:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Castro-Santos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dan v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Dan
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Cherl Finn, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. City of Omaha
as 8:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Alphonso V. Frazier, II
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Levering v. District 41 of Omaha et al
as 8:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Dontavius Levering
Defendant:
District 41 of Omaha, Police Chief O.PD. and Officer Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Boyd et al
as 8:2023cv00512
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Garcia
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd and Rob Jefferys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Omaha, Cty- Prosecutor
as 8:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Omaha, Cty- Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
