US District Court for the District of North Dakota Civil Rights Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 357
Emrit v. Silrum et al
as 1:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Jim Silrum and Democratic Party of North Dakota, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. North Dakota
as 1:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Charles Arthur Thomas Jordan, Dr.
Defendant:
North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fool Bear v. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Tribal Council et al
as 1:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Archie D. Fool Bear
Defendant:
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Tribal Council, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Tribal Council Election Commission, Dave Archambault, II and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 1:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Twardowski v. Bismarck Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Radomysl Twardowski
Defendant:
Bismarck Police Department, Glen Ternes, Lyle Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Dakota Gasification Company et al
as 1:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Dakota Gasification Company, Does 1-10 and Roe Corporations 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nadeau v. Shipman et al
as 1:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Diana Nadeau
Defendant:
David Shipman, Deborah Addy, Boyd Addy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Jamestown, North Dakota, City of et al
as 3:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nagel
Defendant:
Jamestown, North Dakota, City of and Scott Edinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. City of Bismarck, North Dakota et al
as 1:2017cv00059
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hansen v. South Central District Court et al
as 1:2017cv00055
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
