Ninth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 28,545
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jane Randolph
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kelly Mathew Padden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv03377
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mathew Padden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
Dawn Elizabeth Martin
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DeVore v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. DeVore
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Briskey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03060
Plaintiff:
Kevin John Briskey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goodell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Ranee T Goodell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Corby v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05043
Plaintiff:
Ricky Corby
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Suarez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Felipe Suarez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Julie Somerville v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03378
Plaintiff:
Julie Somerville
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Whitney Renee Ruffin v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03376
Plaintiff:
Whitney Renee Ruffin
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
