Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 82,442
Johnson v. Maningo Law et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Adrian Johnson
Defendant:
Maningo Law and Lauria Lynch-German
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Lipsey Jr. v. Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv03716
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr
Defendant:
Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy, Captain Z. Soisuvarn, Lieutenant A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. King County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Killian White
Defendant:
King County Sheriff's Office, Tyler Hunt, Jeffrey Petrenchak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Calderon v. Covello
as 2:2024cv01309
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Defendant:
P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01273
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01272
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nible v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
William Lyle Nible
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber and Tommee Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roderick Washington et al v. Fern et al
as 2:2024cv03723
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
Shen Jay Fern, Jackie Lacey, Jose I. Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Surkhi, Connie Gipson, J. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
