Alaska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 513
Smith v. Alaska Department of Revenue et al
as 3:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Revenue, Office of Child Support, Office of Children Services and others
Stansberry v. Enter Medical Records Depts Medical Advisory Committees et al
as 3:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Leroy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter Medical Records Depts Medical Advisory Committees, ACCE Medical Staff, N-3 Hample and others
Angellan v. Zorea
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Phillip Michael Angellan
Defendant:
Moshe Zorea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomack v. Kwon et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lomack
Defendant:
Ryan Kwon, John Woya and Demitrius Kargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Gorup et al
as 3:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Douglas N Lane
Defendant:
Chelsea Gorup, Viola Hartley and Paula Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kone v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Tidiane Kone
Defendant:
Bernice C. Hernandez, Mark Phang, Mike Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Dept. of Corr. at Mat-Su Pre-Trial et al
as 3:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Rodney R. Rhodes
Defendant:
Dept. of Corr. at Mat-Su Pre-Trial, Sherry Olsen, Dorren Kitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stansberry v. Enter Alaska Public Defender Attorney Case File et al
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter Alaska Public Defender Attorney Case File, Sidney Billingslea, Johnson and others
Brooks v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Jason Ray Brooks
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Seton v. Brockman et al
as 3:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Norman Ronald Seton
Defendant:
Kenneth Brockman and Janina Simutis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
