US District Court for the District of Arizona Civil Rights Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 9,829
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
More v. Mayo Clinic et al
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Pamela D More and Pamela Diane More
Defendant:
Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Hospital and Rachel Lindor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Henry v. Newman et al
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Bernard Thomas Henry, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald Newman, Victoria Steele, Gary Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Aguilar v. Innovative Funding Services
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Deyra Pamela Carranza Aguilar
Defendant:
Innovative Funding Services doing business as Tresl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Blackman et al v. West USA Realty Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Jacob Blackman and Kayla Blackman
Defendant:
West USA Realty Incorporated, Team Minik, Daniel Ahluwalia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Mangus v. Kiefer et al
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Teresa Mangus
Defendant:
Joseph Kiefer and Stasy Avelar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
