US District Court for the District of Arizona Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 9,819
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Carrillo v. Bank of America
as 2:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrillo v. Federal Trade Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission and Christopher Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carrillo v. Fox News Corporation
as 2:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Fox News Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrillo v. U.S. Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, Casa Grande Police Department, United States Department of the Treasury, Comptroller of the Currency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carrillo v. Comenity Capital Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Comenity Capital Bank, Caesar's Casino, Harrah's Ak-Chin Casino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winters v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
