US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,956
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pr Diversity-Petition for Removal
Anderson v. Peterson
as 4:2024cv05166
Plaintiff:
Levar D Anderson
Defendant:
David Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Owens v. All Elite Wrestling et al
as 1:2024cv03205
Defendant:
Daniel Bryanson and All Elite Wrestling
Plaintiff:
Leland H Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Stone v. Chelan County et al
as 1:2024cv03199
Plaintiff:
Brock Stone
Defendant:
Mariana Cabrera, Ashlyn Rediger, Cindy Dietz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jobe v. Christopher
as 1:2024cv03196
Plaintiff:
Mark J Jobe
Defendant:
Klickitat County and Dan Christopher
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Durham et al. v. Rice et al.
as 2:2024cv00401
Defendant:
Matthew Daley, Bob Ferguson, Peter E Kay and others
Plaintiff:
John-Michael Ray Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity-Labor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
