US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 182
United States of America v. Four Thousand ($4,000) Dollars in United States Currency et al
as 2:2009cv00476
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Four Thousand ($4,000) Dollars in United States Currency, 2006 Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa Motorcylce, VIN: JS1GW71AX62109649, with all appurtenances and attachments thereon, 1975 Chevrolet Impala, VIN: 1L39H5Y160800, with all appurtenances and attachments thereon and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Four Thousand ($4,000) Dollars in United States Currency et al
as 1:2009cv00476
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Four Thousand ($4,000) Dollars in United States Currency, 2006 Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa Motorcylce, VIN: JS1GW71AX62109649, with all appurtenances and attachments thereon, 1975 Chevrolet Impala, VIN: 1L39H5Y160800, with all appurtenances and attachments thereon and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Thirty Three Thousand Two Hundred Seventy Nine ($33,279) Dollars in United States Currency et al
as 2:2009cv00364
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thirty Three Thousand Two Hundred Seventy Nine ($33,279) Dollars in United States Currency and Miscellaneous Custom-Made Gold Jewelry
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil forfeiture
United States of America v. Seventeen Thousand Four Hundred Forty Eight ($17,448) Dollars in United States Currency
as 2:2009cv00038
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Seventeen Thousand Four Hundred Forty Eight ($17,448) Dollars in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Six Thousand Two Hundred Seven ($6,207) Dollars in United States Currency
as 2:2008cv00999
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Six Thousand Two Hundred Seven ($6,207) Dollars in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. $519,153.50 in funds seized from Compass Bank Account No. ****0605 in the name of Rapid Drywall Subcontractors, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00834
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$519,153.50 in funds seized from Compass Bank Account No. ****0605 in the name of Rapid Drywall Subcontractors, Inc., $9,869.83 in funds seized from Compass Bank Account No. ****5744 in the name of Octavio Trejo Patino and Ronda Baird, $4,685.38 in funds seized from Compass Bank Account No. ****1124 in the name of Barbara S. Haynes and Ronda Baird and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Eight Thousand Six Hundred ($8600) Dollars in United States Currency
as 2:2008cv00702
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eight Thousand Six Hundred ($8600) Dollars in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Fourteen Thousand One Hundred Fifty Six and 83/100 Dollars
as 2:2008cv00656
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Fourteen Thousand One Hundred Fifty Six and 83/100 Dollars
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. One Parcel of Real Property Located at 444 Essie Morris Road, Brownsville Community, Macon County, Alabama, With All Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon (MAG+)
as 3:2008cv00635
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Parcel of Real Property Located at 444 Essie Morris Road, Brownsville Community, Macon County, Alabama, With All Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon
Claimant:
Ethel J. Morris and Demitres Morris
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 2001 Ford Expedition VIN: 1FMRU17W51LA73839
as 2:2008cv00579
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2001 Ford Expedition VIN: 1FMRU17W51LA73839
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
