US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 501
Boone et al v. Baldwin County Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Boone, Christina M. White, Brenda Lee Boone and others
Defendant:
Baldwin County Alabama, Little River Alabama, Anthony Thomas Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Dunn
as 1:2021cv00526
Plaintiff:
Dylan Hendricks
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn and John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Harris et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Daniel Harris, Lacie McCall and Michell Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
Donald Lamar May
Defendant:
Heath Jackson, Todd Stearns and Hawsey Jeremy London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Godwin v. Godwin
as 1:2021cv00486
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin and Adeeb Omar Osama Laiden
Defendant:
Charles O'Neal Godwin and Neal Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickles v. Chase Credit Card et al
as 1:2021cv00479
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Chase Credit Card, Visa Credit Card, American Express and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Alabama
as 1:2021cv00467
Petitioner:
Willie Kevin Williams
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3600
Mickles v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
United States of America, Bush Administration, Obama Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickles v. Democratic Republic Party of Africa et al
as 1:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Democratic Republic Party of Africa, Democratic Republic Party of Europe and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James, Jr. v. Marshall et al
as 1:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan James, Jr.
Defendant:
Steve Marshall and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
