US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 3,347
King v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Steven D King
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Warden McClain, Officer Mendozza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Carter
as 1:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Demetric Antonio Robinson
Respondent:
Karen Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Traweek et al
as 1:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Jesse Traweek, Tiffany White and Jadadrain Crook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lutin v. USA
as 1:2023cv00141
Petitioner:
Rodney Lamon Lutin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Morgan et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Quinterious Williams
Defendant:
Coy Morgan, Officer Horace Jackson and Det. Horace Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Martin et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Quinterious Williams
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Coy Morgan, Joshua Briskman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reedy v. Folks
as 1:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Kassey Reedy
Respondent:
Sharon Folks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sells v. USA
as 1:2023cv00096
Petitioner:
Jerald Sells
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tate v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Frederick A. Tate
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Easterling Correctional Facility and Steve Marsall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. McDough
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Walker
Defendant:
Chris McDough and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
