US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,347
Myers v. Burch
as 1:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Scott Myers
Defendant:
Paul Burch, Ms. Jackson, Sam Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Alabama v. Pugh
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
Jason Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Removal of Civil/Criminal Action from State Court
Sumpter v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
LaJuan Anthony Sumpter and Lajuan Sumpter
Defendant:
Reosha Butler, Jefferson S. Dunn and Officer Nickols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Morgan
as 1:2023cv00358
Petitioner:
Paul Eugene Bailey
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
John Riley Donald
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Parole and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. USA
as 1:2023cv00351
Petitioner:
Gilberto Gonzalez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lockett v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Donald Dzsan Lockett and Donald D'zsan Lockett
Respondent:
Karen Williams and State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Garcia v. USA
as 1:2023cv00357
Petitioner:
Henry Hernandez-Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McCrary v. Godwin
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Frankie McCrary
Defendant:
Stephanie Godwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCrary v. Rooker et al
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Frankie McCrary
Defendant:
Captain/Warden Gretchen Rooker and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
