U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 3,916
Michael Jennings v. Christopher Smith, et al
as 23-14171
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JEROME JENNINGS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, JUSTIN GABLE, JEREMY BROOKS and others
Mark Stinson v. John Yates, et al
as 23-14178
Plaintiff:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN P. YATES, Warden, BLAIR, Camp Unit Manager, RANDLE, Lt. and others
Kalim Muhammad v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., et al
as 23-14126
Plaintiff:
KALIM A.R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
WENDY'S OF BOWLING GREEN, INC., COWIN KNOWLES, CIARA DENNIS and others
Richard Boyle v. TracFone Wireless, Inc., et al
as 23-14100
Plaintiff:
RICHARD GERARD BOYLE
Defendant:
TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC. and MAGEN MENENDEZ
Sheba Ethiopian Restaurant, Inc. v. DeKalb County, Georgia
as 23-14140
Plaintiff:
SHEBA ETHIOPIAN RESTAURANT, INC.
Defendant:
DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA
Mother Raguel Maria Bey v. Bay Riders Watersports, LLC, et al
as 23-14048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOTHER RAGUEL MARIA BIZARRETT BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BAY RIDERS WATERSPORTS, LLC, TAMPA SANDBOX FOOD COURT, LLC, KHARI EMBERY and others
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice, et al
as 23-14053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
John Doe v. Spring Hill College, et al
as 23-14031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
SPRING HILL COLLEGE, CRAIG MCVEY and WILLIAM ROBERT TATE
Cindy Washington v. Pat Wang, et al
as 23-14035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINDY ELAINE WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
PAT WANG, CHRISTOPHER W. CONWAY, LASANJE HOLLINGER and others
Robert Richardson v. Forsyth County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 23-14012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT EMMANUEL RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, FORSYTH COUNTY, FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
