U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,576
Amy Hopkins, et al v. Stericycle, Inc.
as 24-1570
Plaintiff:
AMY HOPKINS, CHERYL LANE and ADRIENNE HAUSE
Defendant:
STERICYCLE, INCORPORATED
Stella Paterakos v. City of Chicago, et al
as 24-1567
Plaintiff:
STELLA PATERAKOS, M.D.
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO and CRYSTAL WARREN
Bernard Mims v. City of Chicago, et al
as 24-1564
Plaintiff:
BERNARD MIMS
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, KENNETH BOUDREAU, RICHARD PECK and others
John Couch v. USA, et al
as 24-1565
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Attn: Representative Andre Carson and/or Representative Greg Pence, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, a/k/a UNIGOV a/k/a THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS UNIGOV MARION COUNTY INDIANA; Attn: Mayor Joe Hogsett and others
Deborah Brumit, et al v. City of Granite City, Illinois
as 24-1555
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH BRUMIT and ANDREW SIMPSON
Defendant:
GRANITE CITY, ILLINOIS
Brian Futch, et al v. Jay Pritzker, et al
as 24-1536
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FUTCH, JEFFREY BROWN, RICHARD LEDBETTER and others
Defendant:
JAY R. PRITZKER, in his official capacity as the Governor of the State of Illinois, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES and others
David Campbell v. County of Vanderburgh, et al
as 24-1518
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY, INDIANA, VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STANLEY LEVCO and others
Estate of Katharine Saranam Johnston v. Floyd County, Indiana, et al
as 24-1513
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DAN FOREMAN, Captain and others
Shaquille Prince v. Michael Michienzi, et al
as 24-1514
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE PRINCE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MICHIENZI, #357 Romeoville PD, VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE and TOM DORSEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
