U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 2,792
Jade Green v. Jack Howser, et al
as 18-2757
Plaintiff - Appellee: JADE V. GREEN
Defendant - Appellant: JACK HOWSER, ANGELA HOWSER
Thomas Censke v. USA
as 18-2695
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS A. CENSKE
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Federal Bureau of Prisons officials in USP Terre Haute)
Sharrie Bradley v. John Doe, et al
as 18-2699
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHARRIE F. BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN DOE, AKA Bill, Schnucks Manager, JANE DOE, AKA Danyell, Service Desk, SUE KEISER, Schnucks Supervisor and others
Kierra Williamson, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 18-2697
Plaintiff - Appellee: KIERRA WILLIAMSON, PRINCETON B. WILLIAMSON, MICHAEL C. WILLIAMSON
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF CHICAGO, WILFREDO ORTIZ, Officer
Tapanga Hardeman v. Lake County, Illinois, et al
as 18-2672
Plaintiff - Appellee: TAPANGA HARDEMAN
Defendant - Appellant: LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVID WATHEN, Chief and others
John Lerch v. City of Green Bay, et al
as 18-2632
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN L. LERCH
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF GREEN BAY, BRENDA SEIDL, KATHLEEN STADTHERR and others
Jason Wells v. Angela Caudill
as 18-2617
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASON WELLS
Defendant - Appellee: ANGELA CAUDILL
Matthew Flynn, et al v. Karen Donnelly, et al
as 18-2590
Plaintiff - Appellant: MATTHEW P. FLYNN, STEVEN PIRRO
Defendant - Appellee: KAREN DONNELLY, DANIEL GILLETTE, LASALLE COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
Maryam Muhammad v. Beverly Louis, et al
as 18-2573
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARYAM E. MUHAMMAD, formerly known as MIRIAM BRIGGS-MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee: BEVERLY LOUIS, TOM CONRAD
Cecil Shaw v. Kurt Osmondson
as 18-2565
Plaintiff - Appellant: CECIL SHAW
Defendant - Appellee: KURT OSMONDSON, Doctor

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?