US District Court for the Northern District of California Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Wade v. Perez, et al.
as 3:2017cv03830
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Thomas Perez, U.S. Department of Labor, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KRENGLOSKIE v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2017cv03126
Plaintiff:
Michael KRENGLOSKIE
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Teplin v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv02445
Plaintiff:
Kris Teplin
Defendant:
The United States of America, Wendi Joiner and Stanley Emmott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Lafferty v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2017cv02256
Plaintiff:
Jody Lafferty
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. The Presidio Trust et al
as 4:2016cv02122
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jordan
Defendant:
The Presidio Trust and The U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53
Shamonda v. Department of Homeland Security
as 4:2015cv05083
Plaintiff:
Adedeji Shamonda
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blakely v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
as 3:2015cv04685
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Blakely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lai v. The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
as 3:2015cv04142
Defendant:
The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco , Fook Puy Lai and Irene Lai
Plaintiff:
Eric Lai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lai, et al. v. The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, et al..
as 4:2014cv04443
Plaintiff:
Lai Sim Lai and Eric Lai
Defendant:
The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and The City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mann et al v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv02828
Plaintiff:
Roger Mann and Sherrie Mann
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
