US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,460
Pitman v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv01888
Plaintiff:
Nadira Pitman
Defendant:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01889
Plaintiff:
Nadera Pittman
Defendant:
Ali Brown and Demna Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Fulton County Police Department
as 1:2024cv01851
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Fulton County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barton v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Lamont Anthony Barton
Defendant:
Ron H. Freeman and DeAndre Loucks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv01818
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01803
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Damar Bey
Defendant:
Brittany Quiera Austin and Anita L Dowdell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Petro v. Bohannon et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kristen Justice Petro
Defendant:
Justin Bohannon, John Doe Holbrooks and Image Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants et al
as 1:2024cv01789
Plaintiff:
Albert Clayton Simmons
Defendant:
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Georgia Society of CPA's, Georgia State Board of Accountancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wentworth et al v. Connections Academy
as 1:2024cv01774
Plaintiff:
Dawn Wentworth, Yaw Appiah and Journee Hudson
Defendant:
Connections Academy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
