US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,463
Petro v. Bohannon et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kristen Justice Petro
Defendant:
Justin Bohannon, John Doe Holbrooks and Image Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants et al
as 1:2024cv01789
Plaintiff:
Albert Clayton Simmons
Defendant:
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Georgia Society of CPA's, Georgia State Board of Accountancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wentworth et al v. Connections Academy
as 1:2024cv01774
Plaintiff:
Dawn Wentworth, Yaw Appiah and Journee Hudson
Defendant:
Connections Academy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Minton v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
Robert Minton
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Police Department, Officer Balmore Cruz and others
Lowe v. City of Manchester, Georgia et al
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tameka Lowe
Defendant:
City of Manchester, Georgia, Chris Carpenter and Jason Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Shiver et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joey Dixon
Defendant:
Blake Shiver and Georgia State Patrol Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. City of South Fulton et al
as 1:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Barton Wade
Defendant:
City of South Fulton, Officer H. Crouch and Officer M. Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R.C. v. Broce et al
as 1:2024cv01665
Plaintiff:
R.C.
Defendant:
Candice Broce and Russel Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calhoun v. Lamb et al
as 1:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Ansley Calhoun
Defendant:
Almatin Lamb, Jamal Mustafa, Gregory Tillman and others
Daniels v. Aqua Midtown
as 1:2024cv01682
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Daniels
Defendant:
Aqua Midtown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
