US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,026
Ashford v. Jumper et al
as 4:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ashford
Defendant:
Shawn Jumper and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. USA
as 3:2024cv03090
Petitioner:
Adam Dahl
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Floyd v. Ackman et al
as 4:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Sebron Floyd
Defendant:
J Ackman, . Watercotte, Greg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01153
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Arbanal et al
as 2:2024cv02081
Plaintiff:
Otis Carr
Defendant:
. Arbanal, . Wilham, Douglas County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erdmann v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Diane Renee Erdmann
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Webb et al
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Smith
Defendant:
Jon Webb, Jeffrey Standard and Ryan Maride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anglin v. Benning et al
as 1:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Phillip Anglin
Defendant:
Zachary Benning and Samer Assaf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Curran et al
as 3:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Michael R Hendricks
Defendant:
. Curran, Heather .., Kylee .. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Edens et al
as 1:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Juhnell Morgan
Defendant:
. Edens, . Burle, Donald Doolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
