US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 11,042
Carr v. Arbanal et al
as 2:2024cv02081
Plaintiff:
Otis Carr
Defendant:
. Arbanal, . Wilham, Douglas County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erdmann v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Diane Renee Erdmann
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Webb et al
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Smith
Defendant:
Jon Webb, Jeffrey Standard and Ryan Maride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Edens et al
as 1:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Juhnell Morgan
Defendant:
. Edens, . Burle, Donald Doolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Njus v. Warden McClean County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01154
Petitioner:
Joel Njus
Respondent:
Warden McClean County Detention Center
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anglin v. Benning et al
as 1:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Phillip Anglin
Defendant:
Zachary Benning and Samer Assaf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Curran et al
as 3:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Michael R Hendricks
Defendant:
. Curran, Heather .., Kylee .. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 4:2024cv04064
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Hughes et al
as 4:2024cv04063
Plaintiff:
Robbie J Moore
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Tyrone Baker, Wesly Christopherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Pritzer et al
as 1:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
J B Pritzer, U.S. and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
