US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,140
Butler et al v. Louisiana State Penitentiary et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Brandee Butler, Tomeka Robinson and Kalob Jacquet
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary, Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Louisiana Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCall v. LSP Investigation Service et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric McCall
Defendant:
LSP Investigation Service, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nedd v. Bickham
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Bryant Nedd
Defendant:
Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Wade
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Liz Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holden v. Beckham
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Tony Delon Holden
Defendant:
Dustin Beckham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williford v. Hebert et al
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williford
Defendant:
Susan Hebert, Livingston Parish Detention Center, Parish of Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myles v. Irvine
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Myles
Defendant:
Jasmyne Irvine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copelin v. Barton et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Darrius Randy Copelin
Defendant:
Ruthie Barton, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williford v. Hebert et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williford
Defendant:
Susan Hebert and Livingston Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
