US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 110
Pearson et al v. Hodgson et al
as 1:2018cv11130
Plaintiff:
Kellie Pearson , Roger Burrell , Brian Givens and others
Defendant:
Thomas M Hodgson and Securus Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burgos v. Suffolk County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2018cv10961
Plaintiff:
Luis Burgos
Defendant:
Suffolk County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Pedreira v. Russell et al
as 1:2018cv10046
Plaintiff:
Robert J Pedreira
Respondent:
Richard Russell, Kennedy, Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Duke et al v. Sessions III, Attorney General of the United States
as 1:2017cv12430
Defendant:
Jeffrey Sessions III, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff:
Elaine Duke, Thomas Homan, Chritopher Cronen and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Troncoso v. Sheriff of Middlesex County et al
as 1:2017cv11859
Plaintiff:
Manuel Troncoso
Defendant:
Sheriff of Middlesex County, Carole Cafferty, Kitchen Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MCCUSKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv11334
Plaintiff:
EDWARD G. MCCUSKER
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ft. Devens Medical Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedraza v. Labelle et al
as 1:2017cv10833
Plaintiff:
Jose Pedraza
Defendant:
Robert Labelle, Joseph Bissonnette, Christopher Braley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Baker et al
as 3:2017cv30021
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charlie Baker, Maura Healy, Karen Polito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipscomb v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2016cv12069
Petitioner:
Anthony Lipscomb
Respondent:
J Grondolsky and The Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eddington v. Grondolsky
as 1:2016cv11711
Petitioner:
Timothy Eddington
Respondent:
Warden J. Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
