US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Torts - Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,523
Woodford et al v. Woodford
as 4:2024cv10166
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dominic Woodford and Darlene Anita Woodford
Defendant:
Penny Marie Julia Woodford
Weaver v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv10157
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Weaver
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, Welltok, Inc. and Beaumont Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kheterpal v. Geater
as 2:2024cv10033
Plaintiff:
Vikas Kheterpal
Defendant:
Jason Geater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
TT Club Mutual Insurance Limited v. Toral Motor, LLC
as 2:2024cv10030
Plaintiff:
TT Club Mutual Insurance Limited
Defendant:
Toral Motor, LLC
Deramus v. 532 Title Way LLC
as 2:2024cv10017
Plaintiff:
Pavielle Deramus
Defendant:
532 Title Way LLC
Bond Pharmacy, Inc v. The Health Law Partners, P.C.
as 2:2023cv13069
Plaintiff:
Bond Pharmacy, Inc, d/b/a AIS Healthcare and Bond Pharmacy, Inc Doing business as AIS Healthcare
Defendant:
The Health Law Partners, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Zawideh v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 2:2023cv12993
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Zawideh
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. and Abbott Diabetes Care Sales Corp.
Interested Party:
Howard B. Goldman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Myslivecek et al v. FCA US LLC
as 5:2023cv12980
Plaintiff:
Dean Myslivecek, Paul Caputo, Christopher Chow and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Love v. Michigan Property Resources et al
as 2:2023cv12944
Plaintiff:
Michell Love
Defendant:
Michigan Property Resources and Angela W Montgomery
Willey v. LKQ Global LLC
as 4:2023cv12933
Plaintiff:
Kay Willey
Defendant:
LKQ Global LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
