US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 3,627
Caldwell #406128, Jr. v. Morrison
as 1:2022cv00700
Petitioner:
Ramon Caldwell #406128, Jr.
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonham v. LaJoye-Young
as 1:2022cv00694
Petitioner:
Kevin E. Bonham
Respondent:
Michelle LaJoye-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonham v. LaJoye-Young
as 1:2022cv00695
Petitioner:
Kevin E. Bonham
Respondent:
Michelle LaJoye-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dyson v. Morrison
as 1:2022cv00684
Petitioner:
Dallas Dyson
Respondent:
Warden Bryan Morrison and Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker #654194 v. Burgess
as 1:2022cv00642
Petitioner:
Fischer Tucker #654194
Respondent:
Michael Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nekvasil v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00617
Petitioner:
James R. Nekvasil, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carlton #113154 v. Rewerts
as 1:2022cv00597
Petitioner:
Edward Nathaniel Carlton #113154
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore #208380 v. Corrigan
as 2:2022cv00135
Petitioner:
Terrence Terrell Moore #208380
Respondent:
James Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Carl
as 1:2022cv00566
Petitioner:
Gregory Pierre Matthews
Respondent:
Becky Carl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Verhulst v. Braham
as 1:2022cv00563
Petitioner:
Jason Douglas Verhulst
Respondent:
Melinda Braham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.