US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 215
Miller-Bey v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00272
Defendant:
Van Loo, Brock Van Loo, MD John Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Hilary B Miller-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Precythe et al
as 4:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
Dion Armstrong
Defendant:
Unknown Ludwick, Jason Lewis, Unknown Oaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Moberly Prince of Palace Free Masons et al
as 2:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Mark Ester, Corizon Health Care Services, Tammi Gittemeier and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. Cody et al
as 4:2020cv01593
Defendant:
Alison Aubuchon, Unknown Ferguson, Unknown Cody and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan S Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deardorff v. Hendrix
as 4:2020cv01574
Respondent:
Dewayne Hendrix
Petitioner:
Ryan Deardorff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hook v. Lawson
as 4:2020cv01067
Plaintiff:
Charles A Hook
Defendant:
Teri Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Meherg v. Cook County Dept. of Corr. et al
as 1:2020cv00015
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Corr., Dr. Akinrinola Fatoki, Dr. Charles Pewitt and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Skrivan, PA-C, Officer John Doe 1 and Scott K Meherg, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Reilly et al
as 4:2019cv03119
Defendant:
Tom Llewellyn, Michael A. Reilly, James Gaddy and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Dillon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dinkins v. U.S. Penitentiary Atlanta
as 4:2019cv02398
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Dinkins
Defendant:
U.S. Penitentiary Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansfield v. Boyles et al
as 4:2019cv02124
Defendant:
Alana Boyles and Corizon Health
Plaintiff:
David W. Mansfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.