US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 4,549
Kariuki v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2023hc02241
Petitioner:
Joseph Kariuki
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02277
Petitioner:
LaQuan Leon Williams
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Rich
as 5:2023hc02278
Petitioner:
Gregory Reeves
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yarborough v. Waddell
as 5:2023hc02279
Petitioner:
Garry Artis Yarborough
Respondent:
Stephen Waddell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otey v. Rich
as 5:2023hc02276
Petitioner:
Brandon I. Otey
Respondent:
D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Trenkler v. Rich
as 5:2023hc02274
Petitioner:
Alfred Trenkler
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023hc02272
Petitioner:
David Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee and Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Ishee
as 5:2023hc02271
Petitioner:
David Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butts v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02270
Petitioner:
Jerome Jilah Butts
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Priest
as 5:2023hc02273
Petitioner:
William Stevenson Phillips
Respondent:
Pazavar Priest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
