US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 62
West v. J.O. Stevenson, Inc., et al
as 7:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Charles E. West
Defendant:
J.O. Stevenson, Inc. , Stevenson Automotive, Inc. , SAG Payroll, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Schewe v. Mohawk Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Jochen Schewe
Defendant:
Mohawk Industries, Inc. , Pergo, LLC and Unilin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Schewe v. Mohawk Industries, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jochen Schewe
Defendant:
Mohawk Industries, Inc. , Pergo, LLC and Unilin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Gagne v. Vidant Roanoke-Chowan Hospital
as 2:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Catherine Gagne
Defendant:
Vidant Roanoke-Chowan Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Canady v. Pender County et al
as 7:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Janice Canady
Defendant:
Pender County , Pender County Health Department and Carolyn Moser
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cruthirds v. Lacey et al
as 5:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
Shelia Y. Cruthirds
Defendant:
Raymond P. Lacey, Brandi Swart, Kathy J. Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Wilson v. Earth Fare, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00247
Defendant:
Earth Fare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Bacon v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 7:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
Amanda Bacon
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Holmes v. The Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated
as 5:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Holmes
Defendant:
Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Hacking v. Petsmart, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00771
Plaintiff:
Mark Hacking
Defendant:
Petsmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
