US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 50
SPEARMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
REVEREND DR. T. ANTHONY SPEARMAN
Defendant:
DERRICK JOHNSON, LEON W. RUSSELL, GLORIA J. SWEET-LOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
GIBSON v. ROUPAS, JR. et al
as 1:2022cv00517
Plaintiff:
SABRINA GIBSON
Defendant:
THOMAS F. ROUPAS, JR. and PARR INVESTMENTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
HUTTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ALLI LARSEN, DREW LARSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPEARMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
REVEREND DR. T. ANTHONY SPEARMAN
Defendant:
DERRICK JOHNSON, LEON W. RUSSELL and GLORIA J. SWEET-LOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
AGGARWAL v. ERICKSON et al
as 1:2022cv00087
Defendant:
MAYA ELIZABETH MCKINNEY, DEVON MICHAEL ERICKSON, ALEC MCKINNEY and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BAKER AGGARWAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
DOZIER v. ALLGOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Win Dozier
Defendant:
Sherri Allgood, Tonya Yvette Troublefield and Yvette Daye Troublefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STANHISER v. STANHISER et al
as 1:2021cv00407
Defendant:
JAMIE STANHISER and DARLENE CHEEK
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA STANHISER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIGGS v. CITIZENS ONE AUTO FINANCE
as 1:2021cv00398
Plaintiff:
JAVIER A. DIGGS
Defendant:
CITIZENS ONE AUTO FINANCE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BHAVNANI v HAYS
as 1:2021cv00236
Defendant:
Stephen Hays
Plaintiff:
Shivan Bhavnani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
