US District Court for the District of North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 288
Bridges v. Director of the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 1:2022cv00163
Petitioner:
John Clark Bridges
Respondent:
Director of the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oien v. Pringle
as 3:2022cv00157
Petitioner:
Jason Wayne Oien
Respondent:
Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Pringle
as 3:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Jerry Verl Holmes, Sr.
Respondent:
Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atkins v. Pringle
as 3:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
Cody Michael Atkins
Respondent:
Warden Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Landis v. Krabbenhoft
as 1:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Douglas E. Landis
Respondent:
David Krabbenhoft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Sayler
as 1:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Allen Charles Thomas
Respondent:
Warden James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parizek v. Hurly
as 1:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
Scott Ramon Parizek
Respondent:
Michael P Hurly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parizek v. Michael P hurley Mchenry county
as 1:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
Scott Parizek
Respondent:
Michael P. Hurley McHenry County and Michael P hurley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Holmes v. Harford County, Maryland
as 1:2022cv00049
Petitioner:
Jerry Verl Holmes, Sr.
Respondent:
Harford County, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. N.D.S.P.
as 1:2022cv00047
Petitioner:
Delvin Lamont Shaw
Respondent:
N.D.S.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
