US District Court for the District of North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 398
Benter v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Dept. of Corrections, Stephanie Keuhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Schroeder et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Tammy Schroeder, Jesse Thompson, Randy McGonigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Morse et al
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Doug Morse, Captain Ebach, Shannon Davison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Nelson et al
as 1:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Jana Nelson, Deb Houdek, M. Hundley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Rufu et al
as 3:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
S. Rufu, Sgt. Drechsel and Corporal Pestel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hagen
as 1:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. John Hagen, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricot v. Mulder Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Toussaint Reginald Ricot
Defendant:
Mulder Hospitality Group, Inc., Corey J Quinton, Marty Mulder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Longtail v. Larocque
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Longtail
Defendant:
Officer Stacey Larocque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuh v. Balaban et al
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Steven Balaban and Tessa M. Vaagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Roger Jackson
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
