US District Court for the District of North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 398
Loggins v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Defendant:
United States, Cass County Jail and Sanford Health
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Cass County Sheriffs Department, United States and Cass County Jail
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Gould et al
as 3:2021cv00098
Defendant:
Tyler Nord, Jessica D. White, Ryan J. Younggren and others
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koon v. Frobig
as 3:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Andrew Frobig
Plaintiff:
Jerome Wesseh Koon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laroque v. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa et al
as 3:2021cv00092
Defendant:
Turtle Mountain Agency and Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa
Plaintiff:
Tylando Ronald Laroque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Pringle et al
as 3:2021cv00084
Plaintiff:
Roy Powell
Defendant:
DOCR Officials, Chad Pringle, Medical Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Supervalu Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Supervalu Inc., WSI North Dakota, Fargo Cass Public Health and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Ignacio Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azure v. Stordahl et al
as 3:2021cv00068
Defendant:
Hannah LNU, Troy Peter Cymbaluk, Andrew Larson and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence A. Azure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins et al v. Pringle et al
as 1:2020cv00206
Defendant:
Chad Pringle and Colby Braun
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peters, James Kremer, Cody Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins et al v. Pringle et al
as 3:2020cv00206
Defendant:
Chad Pringle and Colby Braun
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peters, James Kremer, Cody Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
