US District Court for the Northern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 2,728
Mothersell v. Hood
as 9:2023cv00886
Petitioner:
Robert M. Mothersell
Respondent:
Todd Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parks v. Towns
as 9:2023cv00885
Petitioner:
Clarence T. Parks
Respondent:
New York State Supreme Court/Onondaga County and Darryl C. Towns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00863
Petitioner:
Craig Thompson
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. People of the State of New York
as 9:2023cv00845
Petitioner:
Tyrieke Bradley
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanson v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv00822
Petitioner:
Pamela Hanson
Respondent:
Governor Hochul and President USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stokes v. Goodman
as 9:2023cv00813
Petitioner:
James E. Stokes
Respondent:
Denisha Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Montagari
as 9:2023cv00800
Petitioner:
Tyler Richards
Respondent:
A. Montagari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fowler v. Bradford
as 9:2023cv00768
Petitioner:
Nero Fowler
Respondent:
D. Bradford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rahaman v. Bennett
as 9:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Cendno Rahaman
Respondent:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coyne v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2023cv00700
Petitioner:
James Coyne
Respondent:
Commissioner Ann Marie T. Sullivan and New York State Office of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
