US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 93
Tackett v. Hallett et al
as 4:2021cv00188
Defendant:
Mirta Hallet, Cody Lowen and Sheriff of Nowata County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff:
Sarah Tackett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knighten v. Tulsa County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Herndon Knighten, Herndon DeWayne Barnes and Herndon DeWayne Jones
Defendant:
B Byrd, Tulsa County Sheriff Department, Aaron Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sneed v. Walton
as 4:2021cv00185
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Otto Sneed, II
Defendant:
Scott Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Matthew Willis, Sarah Kessler, City of Tulsa, Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Leatherman v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00065
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., John Doe, Michael Sizemore and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Leatherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wirtz v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections Officials
as 4:2020cv00675
Defendant:
Vic Regalado and Oklahoma Department of Corrections Officials
Plaintiff:
Robert Wirtz, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrickson v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 4:2020cv00646
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Attorney General of the United States and Raymond Byrd
Plaintiff:
Tim Fredrickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sivits v. Johns et al
as 4:2020cv00630
Plaintiff:
Brenda Sivits
Defendant:
Jeffrey Johns, John Hodge, Janet Dowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claudio v. LNU et al
as 4:2020cv00640
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Vic Regaldo, FNU Wilkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anibal Claudio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Bowen et al
as 4:2020cv00621
Defendant:
Mark Bowen and Michael Sizemore
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
