US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 241 - 250 of 3,372
Graves v. Matteucci
as 6:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
Drucilla Ramona Graves
Respondent:
Delores Matteucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cuevas v. Fhuere
as 6:2023cv00365
Petitioner:
Santos Cuevas
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez Trujillo v. Miller
as 2:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
Javier Hernandez Trujillo
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawford et al v. Morrison
as 3:2023cv00307
Petitioner:
Damien Laron Crawford and Raterra Bowens
Respondent:
Captain Kurtiss Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gattis v. Hendrix
as 3:2023cv00301
Petitioner:
Robin Michael Gattis
Respondent:
DeWayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norton v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Krochmal v. Fhuere
as 6:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
Nicholas Krochmal, Jr.
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dittmar v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00275
Petitioner:
Jesse S. Dittmar
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turner v. Cain et al
as 2:2023cv00268
Petitioner:
Daniel Turner
Respondent:
Brad Cain and Snake River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres-Nievez v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00261
Petitioner:
Adan Torres-Nievez
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
