US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 251 - 260 of 3,372
Cisneros v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
William Cisneros
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. Peters
as 3:2023cv00259
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Diane Downs
Respondent:
Collette S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodgins v. Hendrix
as 3:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
Kris Hodgins
Respondent:
Dewayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Applegate v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
Daniel Gary Applegate
Respondent:
Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
Joshua A.D Hall
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giffen v. CIA / DOD / Others
as 6:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Todd Giffen
Respondent:
CIA / DOD / Others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Manning v. Martinez et al
as 3:2023cv00231
Petitioner:
Andrew James Manning
Respondent:
Captain Jose Martinez and Multnomah County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Street v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00211
Petitioner:
Bradford Street
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Contreras v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
Erik Raymundo Contreras
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Limbaugh v. Jaquez
as 3:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Christopher Eldon Limbaugh
Respondent:
Israel Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
