US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 271 - 280 of 3,372
Gutierrez v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
Antonio A. Gutierrez
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. State of Oregon
as 2:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
Adam John Davis
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Chad Samuel William Pearson
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere, Attorney General of the State of Oregon and Ellen Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayo v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Mayo
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. Oregon Board of Parole
as 3:2022cv01993
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Diane Downs
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. People of the State of Oregon
as 3:2022cv01976
Petitioner:
Nimrod B.H. Taylor
Respondent:
People of the State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keeten v. Salem Jail
as 6:2022cv01955
Petitioner:
Patrick L. Keeten
Respondent:
Salem Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silva v. Fhuere
as 6:2022cv01886
Petitioner:
Brandon Michael Silva
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salmon v. Miller
as 2:2022cv01818
Petitioner:
Richard W. Salmon
Respondent:
Jaime Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Thrasher
as 3:2022cv01828
Petitioner:
J. Garrett Smith
Respondent:
Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
